Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Do signature campaigns silently go all-in?
by
apogio
on 23/10/2024, 11:22:53 UTC
I'm not sure what you mean here. One could argue the universe is always in equilibrium. And for every sucker who no longer falls for money grabbing schemes, 10 new ones are born.

Sorry, all I meant was that justice comes sooner or later.

It's gone out of subject. I think it's clear that it's as simple as:

1. bitcoin companies generate less income or don't want to use their income for advertisement in the forum.
2. the users of the forum prefer to wear signatures that pay them (which is acceptable).
3. the forum is an all-inclusive space where too many subjects are developed and it's not a bitcoin-only forum. This is also acceptable, I guess. It may haven't been Satoshi's primary idea, but in order to keep the forum running and bring more people you need to broaden the areas that are covered.



Hereby, I don't talk about casinos / gambling anymore, but my final plea is: please, before wearing any signatures, just make sure the company is legit, no matter what their business area is. Don't wear signatures just for the money. Verify (as well as you can) the integrity of the business that you promote. Luckily, most campaign managers filter out the garbage and present mostly solid companies, but the past has shown that some companies advertised in here weren't as good as people thought they were.