Russia has expressed in the past that they have only 2 or 3 reasons for their part in the Ukraine war. None of their reasons includes conquering Ukraine. But their reasons DO include keeping Nato out. The question is, how does Russia keep Nato out without conquering Ukraine? Russia, with their latest war successes, is having to examine this first hand, right now.
[...]
The obvious problem with this is that you would need to believe Ruzzia. Without military protection there is nothing preventing Ruzzia from taking Ukraine - and they do not need any reason other than getting another area to exploit resources, just like they annexed Crimea.
More on Zelensky threatening nukes. If Ukraine isn't allowed to join Nato, Zelensky will build nukes that nobody but he controls.
[...]
Absolutely. As said Ukraine HAD nukes, enough to make it the third country with more Nukes in the world at that time. Not only that, they had very modern strategic bombers. And he is absolutely right, if Ukraine had chosen to keep the nukes they had, Ruzzia would have to think twice before attacking.
[...]
But just to make it veeeeery easy for you, I am now going to write in Texan: "If you are threatened by people with guns, the Texan solution is to buy guns of your own".BTW Ukraine is not threatening the US, whereas Ruzzia is creating a situation in which many countries are considering having nukes and increasing their arsenal.
~
Where you err is in the fact that Zelensky cancelled elections. This takes away freedom from the people. But Texas guns
IS freedom for the people. You continue to show how backward and self-contradictory you are.
Keep it up. The more you talk, the more ignorant you show yourself to be.
[...]
It is so funny when you speak of ignorance that I just thank myself for ordering an anti-spill keyboard.
No, Zelensky was elected democratically and you are either ignorant (most likely) or simply throwing another unproven shit.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/07/11/ukraine-democracy-wartime-elections-russia-zelensky/Voting in the middle of the Russian invasion is legally and practically unworkable.
Martial law is established as a concept in the Ukrainian Constitution and last updated by the national legislature in 2015, before Zelensky entered politics.
So, not "Zelensky did not cancel the elections" - they would actually be possible if there were no war ongoing.
So, the logic that applies to Texas - You have the right to have a gun to protect yourself from people with guns, applies to Ukraine: It has the right to have nukes to protect itself from people with nukes.
If the US wishes to keep the treaty of non-proliferation, they would need to make sure that nations under threat by a nuclear power are effective protected. That is in essence the concept of non-proliferation: I do not get armed with nukes to the teeth as long as you (nuclear power) do not use your leverage to attack me.