Published data about the liquidity of the site showed me that the big savers left it very before the facts that almost everyone has talked lately on this thread:

(1) In which concerns stats published by the site, I myself have collected them during several weeks in a row.

(2) In which concerns later move of a huge number of BTCs to ETH, it is information that someone has shared later in this thread pointing out to published data elsewhere that looked interpreted with some sort of racionality.

The FUN Token's business was going to be a fiasco because of the fees and I haven't the faintest idea if it was by incompetence or ignorance. Then, Freebitco tried to save the operation doing what almost everyone else can learn from this thread.

Interpret this at your discretion.