Do you think that the adoption of Bitcoin in poor countries as a means of payment can be a source of conflict
No, bitcoin can rather be a means to resolve any lingering conflict dealing with a country if adopted, we have a very good example with how bitcoin was being adopted as a legal tender in El-Salvador and ever since then, things have been working more better for them, despite not considering the series of warnings from the IMF over their decision, this thought us a lot of lessons, that no one can see or feel our pains the same way we do, even when they assume to be in our shoe, once we are made up for a determination, then we should go straight up for it without looking back or giving up.
I asked this question because many poor countries believe they are in democracy and enjoy freedom.
The basic concept behind democracy has made many to be making demo and craze all in the name of doing democracy, because the intention was taken away long time ago and the freedom had been deprived of the masses, a true democracy is what we have in bitcoin and not politics because the people are free on their own finances, while bitcoin remains a decentralized digital currency.