Do you think that the adoption of Bitcoin in poor countries as a means of payment can be a source of conflict
I asked this question because many poor countries believe they are in democracy and enjoy freedom. However, the reality is that there is still some form of domination by former colonial powers. They are free on paper, but not financially. That’s why I wonder if one day one of these countries decides to adopt Bitcoin as a means of payment and whether this could lead to conflicts.
Adopting Bitcoin could offer several advantages, such as increased financial inclusion, reduced transaction costs, and protection against inflation. However, these benefits may also raise tensions with established financial systems and governments.
Do you think a poor country will experience peace if it makes such a decision?
It's the choice of the government of that country to legalize bitcoin and not their colonial master. That doesn't stop the poor country from paying homage to the country who colonized them because they have adopted bitcoin. Bitcoin freedom is from third-party control over your funds and financial transactions, and not from the exploitation of the country that colonized your country.
Therefore, if a poor country adopts bitcoin doesn't mean that he is free from her colonial master exploits because if you don't accept, they will take it by force in a civilized way.