I read that "
Ripple Labs Founder Donates Another $10 Million in XRP to Support Kamala Harris," and we all know Ripple still has that ongoing SEC case. By principle, politicians shouldn't take gifts that could mess with their decision-making. So, what if Kamala becomes president? Ripple will definitely expect something back for their support.
And what if politicians take donations in altcoins, like how Trump also received some? Does that mean their decisions on regulations could end up favoring altcoins over Bitcoin?
All this political donations will not change anything. Bitcoin aside, in the previous elections that has been held in the US and other influencial countries, the campaign promises are just like waste of saliva people used and forget and I think this is another campaign that is going to be left in the dark, those politicians are very wise with their choice of endorsement because they fear the fire back that will comes back to them, so this changes nothing.
Trump was pro Bitcoin eventually when he wasn't in the office again and was campaign like he was going to pass a bill for Bitcoin to have a place in the US but let's wait and see him win the election, that's when you will realize how terrible he is a president and a leader who campaign with Bitcoin. Politicians are shameless people that forgwt easily but whoever wins the election, it changes nothing about Bitcoin.