PS go find a blackhat forum this is not blackhat stealing world...
I wouldn't worry, judging by the awareness level of OP on how things work, he'd probably be the one who gets hacked if he ever posts his brilliant ideas to the BH community.
There are too many things OP claimed that are complete bogus to anyone even bothering to refute them. Latest one is using a SHA output as a private key, which actually works the other way around. But hey, I'm waiting for that ASIC that can break two different hashing algorithms just to end up with a 256-bits (128-bit secure) public key! I guess it doesn't matter there's not enough juice in the universe to even count all the attempts required to do that.
There is no information to say that the content I have presented on this is wrong. In short, you have no argument.
I want to write to you with mathlab output, which is a linear algorithm that calculates probability.
V = { v ∈ F₂²⁵⁶ | v = (v₁, v₂, …, v₂₅₆), vᵢ ∈ {0, 1} }
I feel your excitement when you first heard about Bitcoin. In those years I was struggling with 5 different languages and math formulas.
You are a difficult character for innovations.
As for the hack, your arguments that deify bitcoin as the perfect deity have no proof. Satoshi forgot something.