Ser, do what you must. Lie, gaslight, cheat, be disingenuous. But I will NEVER back down against you, and against your claims that any service is a scam without proper and verifiable data as evidence. It's simply morally wrong to say that a service is guilty because "in your opinion" it is guilty.
Plus you call me a scammer, a spammer? The only person who is actually neutral in the topic, and who was giving you the benefit of the doubt? I show you your trust-rating,
You are just trolling at this point. Why ask for evidence for something which you already know is true? Plenty of mixers which have advertised on bitcointalk ended up exit scamming.
What happened to this mixer which you were paid to review?
I will write this review according to my personal experience and according to my limited technical knowledge, because I am not a "computer security expert", a blockchain developer, nor am I a kind of user that requires absolute anonymity in the blockchain. But I do have questions and personal opinions, and I might have found some things which could help [banned mixer] improve their service...
I’ll give you a clue. Tumbler .io exit scammed and users from this forum lost their funds. From following your deposits on a block explorer there is no evidence of any actual mixing going on. Your deposits are consolidated in the same transaction and later used to pay another user’s withdrawal. Almost every deposit into this mixer created toxic change and they didn’t even try to prevent users from reusing addresses for their withdrawal. Calling these services custodial wallets is more appropriate. Calling them mixers is dishonest advertising because there is no real meaningful level of obfuscation being provided.