Trump is better than Kabala in every way possible. If you see them equals you should get your head examined by a doctor as something ain't working right in there. On one hand we have Trump who can do a podcast 3 hours straight and talk about anything, and then we have Kabala who can't create one full sentence that makes any sense and constantly laughing like a mental patient.
This is the same impression I have, although I understand that ideologically there are people who would never vote for Trump and/or would vote for any Democratic candidate against the Republican.
Do you think Kamala will gain more votes from people that would never vote Republican or people that would never vote for a convicted felon/rapist/fascist that spent the last 4 years hiding classified documents from the FBI (and showing them to journalists), undermining trust in American elections with lies, and attacking judges, prosecutors and their families while being tried in various civil and criminal trials before being found guilty/liable?
We will never know who truly gained more votes. The standard media is working for the Dem Deep State. We won't know the truth from them.
But, we can see the truth from Joe Rogan.
HUGE! Kamala tried to scam Joe Rogan: Joe Rogan Turns Down Harris Interview Over Campaign’s Demands – BAM
https://worldnews.whatfinger.com/2024/10/29/huge-kamala-tried-to-scam-joe-rogan-joe-rogan-turns-down-harris-interview-over-campaigns-demands-bam/
Joe Rogan declined an invitation to interview Vice President Kamala Harris on his popular podcast, citing excessive demands from her campaign team.
The Harris campaign reportedly requested significant control over the interview format, including the selection of questions, which Rogan found unacceptable.
Rogan, known for his unfiltered and open-ended interview style, felt that the demands would compromise his podcast's authenticity.
The Harris campaign allegedly wanted restrictions on topics, limiting what could be discussed, particularly around contentious issues.
Rogan's refusal highlights his stance against political interference, particularly when it affects open conversation and journalistic integrity.
He has a large, diverse audience and is known for allowing guests from all political backgrounds, but demands for control were a deal-breaker.
The campaign reportedly insisted on pre-screening questions, something Rogan considered an infringement on the organic nature of his interviews.
The move underscores a tension between political figures seeking controlled media exposure and platforms valuing spontaneous dialogue.
Rogan felt that accepting these terms would alienate his audience, who expect unfiltered discussions without political constraints.
The podcast host expressed concerns that such demands from political campaigns are becoming more common, potentially impacting media independence.
Rogan's platform has previously hosted high-profile figures from various political backgrounds, including Bernie Sanders and Elon Musk, without issue.
Critics argue that Harris's campaign's control measures reflect a broader pattern of restricting press freedom within the current administration.
The campaign also reportedly requested final editing rights, which Rogan's team found unacceptable, as it would interfere with the podcast's transparency.
Harris's team has not commented publicly on Rogan's rejection, though sources indicate disappointment over the missed opportunity.
Rogan has frequently criticized the mainstream media for lacking transparency and accountability, making his refusal consistent with his previous stances.
Supporters of Rogan view his decision as a stand against political manipulation, valuing integrity over high-profile interviews.
...
