It has been said that the winner is decided by 100 journalists each picking their top 10 players of the year. Is it possible that these journalists may be affected by some personal bias or patriotism? How objective is this award and is this deciding method really the best?
The journalists are humans who can as well have personal Interests based on their own views of the players performance that is why these journalists can not be in 100% same views.
Perhaps they gives their remarks based on individual views meaning if we have to put them in considerations then it is assumed their choice of deserved candidates per player could be biased since out ofthe100 journalists would vote on different players.
Making it Short, they are not perfect as some users here has said so some would work based on strict facts to whom they believe that deserves it while some would compromised the reality fact.