Not a bad result for Manchester United at all. Both teams get a point. This interim manager, Ruud van Nistelrooy is really something. A few additions to the squad depth in January and Manchester United may just return to winning ways. For all those defending Erik Ten Hag’s tenure at United, do you guys think Manchester United would have performed this well under Erik Ten Hag?
I agree that this wasn't a bad result for Manchester United; they played a good game and attacked like Chelsea, but we still have issues with their attacking players. Garnacho was quite bad against Chelsea, failing to pass some balls to his teammates, including ones that were hard for him to score. He also missed a few opportunities, and if he had been able to score, it would have been a good assist from Bruno Fernandes. But I think Chelsea fans who believe they will defeat Manchester United by seven goals would have found out that Manchester United is not a weak team.
Furthermore, I was unable to witness the great Palmer, who is praised for scoring four goals in the first half
. Based on your question, Manchester United has never performed so well in any game since the beginning of the season, we had a total of 11 shots, 4 were on target, while Chelsea had 12 shots, 3 were on target; if Ten Hag's had been in charge, Chelsea would have scored from every shot on goal against Manchester United.