Well, we should keep things in line and civil in here. Also you have a scam accusation thread, there is no need to further spread partly made up stuff (n.Korea) in this ANN thread because this is considered spamming.
I agree with your recommendation.
That user can keep his scam accusation thread bumping or if he wants, he can bump it in
[LIST] Scam Accusation Cases Against Betting Platform on The Forum. holydarkness can help the user to follow up this case if he has time, that I believe he has good interest of following up scam accusation cases.
I agree with AHOY's recommendation, to keep things on his scam accusation threads [emphasized on the "s", the plural] and not here, but I have to disagree with your recommendation of him bumping it on that list thread, as,
[...]
Please note that it is intended as a summary of the accusations against gambling platforms that have ANN and representative on this forum. As it is intended to be a summary, it will be very much appreciated if discussion, debate, or any other things related to a case pointed out on this thread to be carried out on their respective thread to keep this one clean and tidy. [...]
besides, I've already put his
latest complaint on the list,
[talkimg is currently, at the time this post is made, busy, so this will serve as a placeholder for the snipped part on my list where his threads is on the list]
Now, for me helping the user... unfortunately that's something that I can't do. He's one of three [I think it's actually only two, so just him and someone else] user that I
have to put on ignore.
[this is a placeholder for "ignore image"]
Reason?
I helped his case once, and next time I heard from him [for other case, though still with Stake],
I apparently twisted his words.
So yeah, to be sure that I will not accidentally perceived [in any way] as twisting his words, I am removing myself from all of his present and future cases, with a belief that other overseer will be more capable than me to cater his needs.
We can rest assured that I am still fulfilling my obligation of keeping the status of his cases on my list updated, though, as I frequently click the show/hide his posts to see if there anything that worth changing the status of the cases.
Let me set the record straight—Stake is the one facilitating fiat payments in INR, but they do it through illegal methods. That’s what I stated, and it remains my stance. You’ve consistently defended Stake blindly, ignoring the facts laid bare.
I don’t care about being ignored by a BitcoinTalk member, but what I do care about is exposing unethical practices. My claims are clear: Stake is operating illegally in India. They’re facilitating payments without proper compliance, bypassing GST, and engaging in potential AML (Anti-Money Laundering) violations through Gibraltar, ultimately funneling funds to Australia where their CEO resides.
Important Update: The recent freeze of my bank account was not due to any mistake on my part, but the direct result of a Cyber Crime Police investigation. This isn't just about a bank issue—Stake's payment providers, who facilitate fund transfers from Indian customers, are not registered for GST. They're potentially evading taxes, raising AML concerns. UPI is strictly meant for customer-to-merchant transactions within India, yet Stake is utilizing third-party vendors to circumvent these tax regulations.
It's high time we stop sugar-coating this: Stake’s practices are shady and exploitative, and no amount of blind defense changes these facts. I’ll continue to speak up until they’re held accountable.
