Why I mentioned campaign manager? because it might hurt the campaign manager's feeling and cause them to get less chance to be accepted in campaign.
Yep, that's why
lightlord didn't get any neutral or negative feedback when he demonstrated that his campaign participants' needs were as low on his priority list as they could get. People were meekly complaining in the
Bitvest thread, but it was obvious that they were too intimidated to show any real irritation or to call lightlord out on his inaction.
In the case of @Lightlord, i came across a
thread by Poker Player some time ago about Lightlord's behavior in handling his campaign and i immediately went to his profile to check his trust feedbacks and saw that you and some other DT members have already given him a negative trust for his strange behavior towards his campaign participants and i also saw the neutral tag of @yahoo62278 and the negative tag of @suchmoon which stated clearly that ''anyone who joins his campaign will be at risks of payment delays for weeks and months'' so with such feedbacks from this reputable DT members should have given anyone who wants to join any of Lightlord's campaign the awareness of what they are to face while joining any of his campaigns so i believe a lot of his campaign participants have seen these feedbacks and are willing and ready to take the risk that's the major reason why they were unable to call him out when he couldn't pay campaign participants and moreover, i learnt in the past that if he delays payments for weeks that he usually pays all outstanding debts when he returns so people were literally waiting for a feedback from him with the believe that he will make payments when he returns even though it's not a good habit or practice for someone of his caliber who have been in this forum for a very long time now.