That would be an argument for no law enforcement whatsoever: you can't stop all crime, so why even try to stop any crime. And it's just silly.
Because it's tax payer money. You don't spend tax payer money to tread water. Criminals use privacy coins like Monero, that cannot be surveilled. The argument for surveillance to catch criminals no longer holds up, as they now have tools that allow them to evade government control entirely.
Sure, but you don't get to make you your own definitions based on your personal preferences
I would argue that aiming to criminalize self-custody is objectively against Bitcoin. There's no personal preference to that. It's just what it is.
So both candidates will continue the anti-money laundering rules for Bitcoin etc., but one of them carries the risk of corruptly destroying the entire Bitcoin market for his own gain--and yet you still liked Trump more? Very strange.
One of them has shown appreciation for Bitcoin. The other has actively tried to undermine it. It's that simple to my mind.