Re: Do we need more influencial women in crypto to help the gender embrace it?
When we talk about influencial names in crypto aside the greatest of the greatest like Satoshi Nakamoto and Vitalik Buterin, we hear names like Chanpeng Zhao, Justin Sun, Barry Silbert and the rest. I have only come across few female names which are quite unpopular if you ask me. Names like Caitlin Long, Cathie Wood and Elizabeth Stark are few names that rings a bell out of the thousands names one can find. Do you think there are more influencial women in crypto, this will help to encourage more women into adopting cryptocurrency?
Of course there eee many women who are bitcoin investors aside the few that you have listed, but having the name of more women listed in the table of the top investor does change anything. Because naturally women don't like online investment but physical investment. They want to be in full /total control of their finances, and they are security conscious or minded so they don't have that spirit of a man in the of investment. So even if more women are listed here to attract more women investors the female gender may never take it seriously even though I know many will still buy buy it wouldn't make no much difference.Perhaps there are some which are doing really great but we haven't got to hear their names.
Like I said there is no need. Those that will invest will do and those who will not invest will not also invest. That doesn't change the fact that men are still leading in anything financial system.We do know that there are women investors on this space, it isn't really that obvious just because there's no way on telling on whose behind into those addresses that making up some crypto transactions or simply talking about decentralized and anonymity aspects.
Totally agree.
It depends on the person in question, not on his or her age and definitely not on the gender.
The space is full of wonders without that cut of man / woman
I do agree on what had been said above in regarding on why people do really always talk about women for them not to be having the rights on dealing up with something just because it is really just that good or available only for men? Cryptocurrency is indeed for anyone and there's no right for other people to stop someone on dealing up with crypto. It will really be just that depending on you whether you do deal
with it or not. Embracing adoption is a common approach because this is something revolutionary in terms of payment option or in overall about investing purposes on just simply holding it up. Just like on what lanatsa said above that recognition is something that becoming bigger and bigger as we do go in year by year because it does really give out that kind of chance or opportunity to make profits without having that
involving too much or actions to be made, not unless if you will be dealing up with trading then its something that not all will really be that good at it and have more risk if you dont really know on what you are really that doing. Just let that adoption go because its something that cant be stopped or something that will really be that becoming small. It is really getting that much attention nowadays and year by year
it will really be that increasing even more and this is something which is a common approach to have.