In this big match Chelsea played at home but I don't see Chelsea being stronger than Arsenal but Chelsea can match Arsenal game because Arsenal dominance of the game is superior and the only thing I see from Chelsea is that they have way of playing in counter-attack that is quite dangerous.
There were quite lot of yellow cards in this match and there was goal that Chelsea got but it ended with offside so they failed to get the advantage, some good chances were had by both team but I was quite disappointed when Arsenal had very good chance at the end of the second half extra time which failed to be utilized right before the referee blew the whistle to end the match.
They're equal, but Chelsea played at home, it means Arsenal performance is better than Chelsea. But, what's the point to have high ball possession and dominating the pitch if they can't win the match.
However, Arsenal lost Saka, this is bad for them since Arsenal's performance completely depend on him.
In the Manchester United match against Leicester, I was happy because I was successful in betting and my suspicion that Manchester United would win turned out to be true. Honestly, I was amazed by Manchester United's performance when they competed against Leicester because the Manchester United players played well and were able to take advantage of opportunities well and of course now Manchester United managed to get 3 points and of course this is good progress for Manchester United because of course Manchester United is under their guidance. Ten hag it is very difficult to see Manchester United play like this because now the players look free and they play with confidence.
It just funny that Manchester United fans happy to see their
big team beat small teams at home, I mean it has been expected Manchester United should've won. It's a bare minimum for big teams.