Just an observation, but I’ve noticed that many casinos with signature campaigns eventually stop, and the community seems to forget about them. Meanwhile, the casinos with long-term campaigns are still popular today. Of course, we can’t deny the popularity of these casinos...Stake, Sportsbet, Rollbit, Duelbits, and Betcoin.ag. Maybe it’s because they run their campaigns long-term, so their presence is seen daily on the forum. So, do you think casinos get significant benefits from having a signature campaign, especially when it’s long-term?
I am not sure that the main influx of casino users comes from this forum thanks to the signature campaign. Of course, this is just an assumption, because only casino owners can have the most complete and reliable information. On the other hand, casinos have taken a liking to the signatures of users of this forum, which makes you think that this is done for a reason, because considerable budgets are spent on supporting campaigns. It looks a little ironic (or sad), when almost all signature campaigns are dedicated to casinos, on a forum dedicated to bitcoin (crypto).
Are signature campaigns profitable for casinos? I don't see a clear answer. For old casinos, it seems to be profitable, because they have been running signature campaigns for many years. For new ones? It seems that it is not very profitable, since they stop the campaign after a couple of months. Or, after all, signature campaigns "reveal" themselves best when they are running for a long time? Here you can not do without the opinion of experienced managers.