It has been said that the winner is decided by 100 journalists each picking their top 10 players of the year. Is it possible that these journalists may be affected by some personal bias or patriotism? How objective is this award and is this deciding method really the best?
it's said that the proceedings are as fair as possible, but we all know that's not entirely true... From the moment they placed a limitation on the number of voters for the nomination, it became something that's totally based on their own discretion.