No, there is a single US congressman with a proposed bill right now, and a lot of people on the Internet saying they want this.
Well... yes? If there's a
proposed bill, the people who stand to benefit directly from it will naturally support it, assuming it makes sense for the nation's financial security. What are you expecting? For them to oppose it?
Yes, gold is a product.
Gold is primarily an asset, a commodity. It wouldn't be wrong to call it a "product", since it can be used for direct consumption, but it's just inaccurate to treat it like this, as a whole. Anyway, we're not going to agree on this one, but Bitcoin is not a product; it is not produced for direct consumption, nor is it used for creating other products. It's money; used only for exchanging it with goods and services.
You'd be naive if you think all of these millions spent this election were spent to make Bitcoin more valuable, and thus to help you.
I never thought that money spent on the election particularly help me. How did the discussion go to the benefits from money spent on election? Weren't we talking about money spent by the government on buying bitcoin?