Thanks for this information, this argument is really relevant and it makes me think differently. If a casino can really be fined for allowing children to play, then its owners should be afraid that minors can play games provided by the casino under forged documents. The same applies to betting. Because these children can then report the casino to the police themselves, and I am sure that such cases have occurred.
I think the scenario of entering fake data is something that is very likely to happen very often and is done by underage children who are victims of gambling exposure, and of course it also happens in my country because in my country there are many local sites that can be easily accessed, you can enter fake data without experiencing any problems. On the other hand, regarding casinos that are fined for allowing underage children to gamble, I think that is a reasonable consequence for them to experience because they allow underage children to be involved in their casinos, but I also think that it is unlikely for underage children to report the casino to the police, unless there is a serious underlying reason such as injustice on the part of the casino which for example harms the gambler, but I think for underage children it is very unlikely for them to take such serious actions.
I agree with everything you say, and I think that it is really unlikely that children will inform on casinos, I rather meant underage children who would intentionally want to blackmail casinos, I have seen such children, they were from disadvantaged families.
I wanted to focus the answer on something else, on fake KYC. I recently saw news that there is an AI-based program on the network that easily makes fake photos of documents for KYC, and I think that the future of fake documents is on this.