We're continuously exploring alternative solutions, like wallet-based ID and device fingerprinting, to reduce the need for KYC, though these come with limitations. With time, as we build trust, we aim to keep pushing boundaries to find even better solutions.
Nice to hear that. What kind of solutions are you exploring right now? Is the cost that high that you don't offer them from the beginning? I wonder if users would like to participate in a trial run of such an identification process. However, I'm not sure people will be comfortable with device ID if it requires too many details.
Ensuring robust AML safeguards will be critical for long-term success and avoiding regulatory issues, especially given the risks of seizure similar to Chipmixer. Balance and vigilance are key.
I believe there's a difference between not doing the AML/KYC process and deliberately participating in activity such as money laundering though. CMIIW.
Thank you for your feedback! We completely understand the importance of balancing security with user comfort and privacy. At our casino, we prioritize creating a seamless and trustworthy experience for our players.
We’ve invested in powerful, cutting-edge tools that can detect potential issues such as multi-accounting or fraud without requiring intrusive user involvement. These tools allow us to uphold the principles of transparency and fairness while respecting the anonymity our users value.
As for additional identification processes, we are continuously exploring solutions that align with Web3 principles and provide value without adding unnecessary friction. While traditional identification processes can be costly and time-intensive, our approach is to implement them only when absolutely necessary—for example, in cases of suspected fraud or extremely high turnover.
Your suggestion for a trial run is interesting! We believe that any system we introduce should not compromise user trust or convenience. For now, our focus is on maintaining a clean, fair platform with minimal intrusion. We’re always open to user input and strive to build features that enhance, rather than hinder, your experience.
You're absolutely correct—there is a significant difference between not performing AML/KYC and actively engaging in illicit activities like money laundering.