-snip-
I understand your concerns, and I want to clarify the intent behind a no-KYC casino like ours. The no-KYC policy respects privacy for crypto users, but KYC might be triggered in specific cases, like fraud or regulatory compliance. This isn’t to trap funds but to ensure the platform stays operational and secure.
If ToS changes ever require KYC, we believe in transparency and giving users enough notice to withdraw or comply. Our goal is to balance privacy with trust, ensuring fair and open practices for all users.
I'm not sure about how convincing your promises are to customers - but this isn't my problem. Any customer who cares about privacy may be able to choose your casino within a certain budget - but they still need to consider changes that may occur along the way for various reasons including government compliance and others.
Ultimately customers need to agree to your casino's terms and conditions of service and they need to understand that changes to the ToS can happen along the way and they are fine. This is a risk worth worrying about for those who only gamble at non-KYC casinos.
There has been a lot of excitement about NO KYC, and it’s just interesting.
Our main idea is to create a fair environment, because it’s vital for transformation. All of us users can use the BitcoinTalk community as a judge if we think a particular decision is unfair.
Also we are not blind, we can detect fraudulent activities. This is our insurance to filter out unfair people.
We are going to make niyvi decentralized.