I have no problem accepting criticism. But this criticism must be justified, constructive and rational.
You wanted to borrow $150,000. You said you have personal funds coming in next year that would enable you to repay the loan if it didn't make a return. Once you prove this, I'll remove the negative trust,
Does anyone else think that is irrational and unjustified?
But all this does not matter anymore, because I realized that there is no point in trying to attract investments here on the forum.
Hopefully you care about your reputation and want to fix it regardless.
What exactly do I have to prove to you in public? You are not my investor, so I am not giving you a financial report. Moreover, no one has invested in my project, and therefore I am not going to give public information about my finances. And I am not as stupid as you probably think, to disclose this data to those with whom I have no relationship at all, especially investor relations.
Moreover, the point of confirming the words that I will have such an amount available would be if someone expressed real interest and willingness to invest. Then I would provide all the necessary evidence personally to the potential investor.
And in this case, you are suggesting (but in fact blackmailing) me to disclose information about my finances without any potential benefit for myself just so that you remove the tag? I think that a public demonstration that someone has 150 thousand dollars in their account is definitely not equivalent to removing an unfounded crazy red tag. How do I even know what your intentions are in this matter? What guarantee do I have that you are not a scammer who will try to take these funds knowing that I have them? Or that someone else who is sitting on the forum and reading this information is not a scammer?
You see, all your suspicions about me are much more relevant to you. At least I did not require potential investors to display their funds publicly, so that anyone and everyone would have access to this confidential information.