There is no 100% ideally planned project in the draft phase, and you presented it so persistently.
I don't want to restart or discuss this whole thing, I'm just stating my conclusion that you had too rigid an attitude.
Of course, I will defend the project with all my might and I will do it persistently. Because if the author does not defend his ideas and plans, then how is he going to defend the interests of the investor in such a project? A normal, adequate investor would 100% ask a question if those who offer him an idea for investment would give up at the first opportunity and would not be able to defend their own interests or the investor's. Another question is who to build such a defense in front of. I will repeat once again that there was no criticism. There was mudslinging based on nothing at all. What I agree with is that it is time for me to calm down and just stop trying to convey something to those who are not at all inclined to listen.