But probably for each player there is some optimal value of the usual, frequently used bet. Well, or everyone adheres to some optimal range of bet sizes for themselves. And usually the player does not make bets more than the maximum, as he thinks, but he also does not make bets in the smaller direction, it just becomes completely uninteresting. Another thing is that these optimal individual ranges are very different and they certainly depend on the general wealth of the player or his wealth. And in general on the general standard of living. So probably for a high-quality and interesting game it is necessary to never go beyond these bets.
I hope most gambling players adhere to this.
If they know how much money they can use to place their bet, they will not placing more money that they can not afford. That can disturb their allocated money in gambling because they will just deposit more and more money to place more money and hopes they can wins. Whether they bet against the public or follow what public does, they still remember their limitations and will not trying to break because no guarantee to win on the bet especially if they don't analyze to find the right team that can win. Following public to place a bet can makes them feel greed because they will be sure that public already have an accurate prediction but that will not always right.
Yeah. Of course, a public forecast almost always influences the player's choice of bet. But only an experienced player relies on public opinion in the matter of a victory of a particular team to a much lesser extent than a beginner player. And by the way, often in the long term and when experience, knowledge and intuition tell the player which team to bet on in specific circumstances, he wins more than those players who strictly follow the advice of the public.
But this is already about the skill of the player, which in my opinion is often dictated by intuition, which in turn appears, of course, after a long, long history of this player's games.