If you are totally fine and not care about what we think you wouldn't have even created this account, right?

The problem with your approach is that what you have done / are doing has multiple question marks and your only way of addressing them is by telling us we are not smart enough to figure them out ourselves.

1. You claim you want to solve 135 in 2025. The cost of doing that would be in the millions of dollars, much less than the prize. But you don't seem to have any issues about that, which generally decreases interest for anyone else to even continue looking into the puzzles. Is that what you intended?

2. It's OK to be lucky, and it's also OK to be a billionaire, but it's not OK to destroy hope (which is what you did in your very first post here on the forums).

3. Your "SOTA" code went from "old" 1.23 to "new" 1.15 in a few hours, after you've read my post about being able to solve ECDLP via W1 / W1 or W2 / W2 collisions; you did this update without any kind of mention in the code. I am not stupid to not be able to compare what you changed between two code revisions immediately after it was obvious where you got the info from (one of my replies here with the link). Trust me, you didn't "invent" anything that already did not exist.

So, while you may have a world record at wasting money to look for prestige, I can assure you that you are definitely not a good coder (in my eyes at least, because I am not seeking anything from you, not even your out-of-this-earth CUDA skills).