Hi, as evidenced by their reply above me, BK8 was just managed to get back online today and they've replied to my PM asking their permission to share evidence with yahoo [below is a screenshot to prove that I only received the PM today]
https://talkimg.com/images/2024/11/20/b1rk1.jpegYahoo62278, if you're still interested to get involved in this case and validate their findings as well as help me finalize this case, I can now share you their evidences. Though I --as well as other overseers of this case on this thread, I believe, judging from the point of their posts-- can understand if you're no longer interested on this.
my case status: unresolved
bookmaker BK8 - stole my winnings and half of my deposit
Bookmakers remain an unpunished cell that continues its activities and there is no way to do anything about them. Let's hope that a regulator will soon appear that will outlaw them all and introduce transparent rules that protect players.
Not that simple.
My list does not list the status of a case simply based on the complainant's [or any individuals, really] request. The status on each and every of those cases are the conclusion of them, obtained through either undisputable evidence or findings, or implied signs [agreed by the overseers by no objection] that points to a clear result.
The conclusion of this case, if you insist it to be closed, is actually "resolved", as the casino gave their findings of clear violation.
I could have marked with as such [resolved] from the day I got their evidences, actually, but refrained from doing it, in concern that people will perceive me as "playing judge". So, instead, I invited you to challenge it by having other DT reviewing the evidence, so it's not just me and my mind who gave the conclusion based on what's provided; a second opinion, if you may.
Aaaannddd... here we are.
Although you did not want to be a judge, the situation turned out so that you are in this role now.
You cannot set the case status to "resolved" because you refuse to connect the evidence presented by the bookmaker with my person!
You are trying to behave as correctly as possible, while defending the fictitious subjective evidence of the bookmaker, losing the truth in this dispute! And as you have already made it clear to me, you will not continue to try to find out the truth.
