Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
Question for everyone.
If you find a effective method to complete 135 are you going to share your method/code ?
We have known for years that if you have money you have a head start in these puzzles if you bothered to read from page 70 odd if not before that.
No one here is going to hand you that.
snippets yes.
Me personally i wouldn't.
I would tip a few people in this forum for the intel posted if that's what helped me other than that why am i putting others in a million dollar race when i have a head start.
Its a dog eat dog world full of delusional people.
If you find a effective method to complete 135 are you going to share your method/code ?
We have known for years that if you have money you have a head start in these puzzles if you bothered to read from page 70 odd if not before that.
No one here is going to hand you that.
snippets yes.
Me personally i wouldn't.
I would tip a few people in this forum for the intel posted if that's what helped me other than that why am i putting others in a million dollar race when i have a head start.
Its a dog eat dog world full of delusional people.
Isn't this a super easy task, to test? Give me the same program, and I will run it with a GPU and then with a CPU, and let's see which solves the key first. Let's make it an 80 bit range. 1 GPU versus a single core, or do you want to use as many cores as the CPU has? Any bets on which one finds the key first?
80bit yes, because you can use low DP. For 120-130 and higher - you have to use high DP and you will get big overhead with JLP. And it's not easy to test 120-130bit range to confirm
Also, RetiredCoder, make mods to the program, to create less "kangs" when using a GPU, if it's to crazy for you...it's super easy to do. And another question, how does the speed of "kangs", impact the finding of High DP bits. Does a CPU (which the individual kangs are faster) find high DP bits, faster? Or does the GPU's slow, but many, find more, DP bits, faster?
And the last question, which "high puzzles" have you solved and what did you use to solve (CPU, GPU, DP, etc)
And the last question, which "high puzzles" have you solved and what did you use to solve (CPU, GPU, DP, etc)
Yes I started with JLP code a long time ago, but after some time I got enough experience and I created my own software from scratch - much faster and efficient. So it's not a mod.
Why are your feelings getting hurt? Are you the puzzle solver? Because to me, it sure looks like you’re RetiredCoder. A guy who solves his own mini-puzzle for attention—what more can we expect from him? A guy who supposedly holds a world record but shares code with the public that’s slower than what is already available—what can we expect from him? A millionaire who begs for 100 merit points despite having millions of dollars—what can we expect from him?
If he doesn’t want to share the code, he should just be a man and say, 'I don’t want to share it,' instead of teasing us with 'I’ll share the GPU version in Part 3.' What are we supposed to do with his Part 1, 2, and 3 if he never actually shares his method?
People like JLP have earned respect because they openly shared code that was effective at the time and helped many developers. Meanwhile, RetiredCoder himself said he started with JLP’s code. But where’s the credit to JLP? Instead, we get empty promises and slower code. What can we expect from someone like that?
You think I'm retiredcoder
I can tell you 100 fact i am not the person.
I'm a broke ass working a crappy 40 hour week i got lucky with the mini puzzle that's all simple luck and saw the post early enough and using my brain.
I'm certainly not sitting on millions i wish i was life would be great but sitting on my ass getting hand out code to solve 500k plus puzzles is just not going to happen.
Maybe the whole point retiredcoder is doing with part 1 part 2 part 3 is making people learn ? Ever think that.
You come across as just wanting a handout for doing nothing.
My feelings are hurt ? probably the fact that the guy/women that's solved the most difficult puzzles to date actually came forward (not that they owe any explanation to anyone on this forum) and shared info.
Real technical info and then is meet would a bunch of babies thinking that he must give up his code or he owes them a explanation.
Now after the backlash you think anyone else who solves any puzzles will bother to share methods or details ?
Anyways thanks for the laugh in thinking im a multi millionaire if you want we can put a 1btc bet on ? i mean i dont even have 0.000000000000000000000000000000001 btc but hey it will be a win win bet with a delusion person
