Hmm... I am not sure if you're cherry picking or what, because I could have sworn I've seen many cases on CG and AG with a final ruling as "unjustified complaint" or the likes where the arbitrator takes favor in casino, where the player should not be reimbursed. And I didn't read those two articles you provided as I am about to close my day [enough time for the forum for today and I need to get back to IRL situations], but well, you are one of them, congratulation.
You got your third account reimbursed, not sure as a gesture of good will or because they just take that as their error. But asking for the other account to be reimbursed too? That's crossing the line, especially as you put yourself into it when you falsified your assessment, as well as knowingly [I shall strongly assume as someone who had experience with lawsuits, you treat ToS in a very careful manner] violates your very own written agreement.
And oh, I thought you said that the aim of this thread is
simply to inquire why Roobet did not ban your second account, and
not about milking the casino at all? Yet...
All i want is full refund of second and third
Or partial refund of second and full on third
The third account is not reimbursed still its sitll ongoing i still didnt receive anyting on email from roobet