In my personal opinion, if you had access to a tool that could improve your odds—even by less than 10%—wouldn’t you use it? For example, with a 2x multiplier, the house edge gives a 49.50% chance to win versus 50.50% to lose. If we could shift this to 50.50% in the player’s favor, wouldn’t it be worth a try? I believe we'll give more than "just" 50,50% in the player's favor, but we'll see !

We deliberately avoid delving into complex statistics or probabilities on the site because that would require explaining concepts like the Markov property, which might confuse users. While crash games may seem random, the median over a large number of games stabilizes around 1.98, meaning historical results do have some bearing on future outcomes since it's how the game actually works. People will probably say that the crash game is like flipping a coin, always 50% chance, that the previous results doesn't matter in the future rounds outcome, but at the end of the day, the median of the game has to remain at around 1,98x over a large number of rounds.

I believe the crash are modulated in frequencies and amplitudes, and that historical results have actually bearing on future results, for example, if a 100x multiplier is supposed to occur once every 100 rounds but hasn’t appeared in 1000 rounds, the game will eventually adjust to bring the average back to normal. This could mean more frequent 100x multipliers in the near future; or for example if you have only like 3-4 100x in 2000 rounds, it means you're short 17-16 of them correct? then the game will eventually "even" itself, and you'll most likely see much more 20 in the next 2000 rounds to have something like 40 time 100x over 4000 rounds.