I have a question: If the 66 bit original outgoing transaction 8c8ec6b3511c62500ea9b3a1c30ca937e15d251b55d30290a2a6da2f1124f3fb includes addresses other than 13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so, can the transaction still be replaced?

For example: If the outgoing addresses include not only 13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so but also a new address 1KDwiguXGo4JFJoHA3azAHx4Neqkr76kKs with an outgoing amount of 10,000 satoshis, and the attacker does not possess the private key for 1KDwiguXGo4JFJoHA3azAHx4Neqkr76kKs, can the transaction originating from 13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so still be replaced?