"We" already did test $100k and fail (at least in the short term - 1 week if that might count as short term.

There is nothing wrong with taking profits or selling some of your BTC at various places on the way up, yet I doubt that there is anything special about $100k and in fact $100k may well be a problematic location to be selling very much BTC since a bunch of other weak-handed and ill-informed folks are likely ascribing way too much importance to such round number as if the resistance at such point were to be significant in the whole scheme of things hardly a blip.

So if you want to join those ill-informed folks who are ascribing a lot of value to round numbers, that's your choice.

Since you have been registered on the forum since early 2017, hopefully you have enough  BTC and you have not been too distracted by shitcoins over the years (my having had done a quick glance through your prior posts, I have my doubts about whether you have even close to enough BTC or you even know the difference between bitcoin and blockchain).


Then what?

Send an e-mail/text to all of our friends and say:  "I told you so."

hahaha.. I should be poo pooing the idea of $100k.. since it may well end up causing gravitation above such number and perhaps later become support rather than resistance, and yeah, it continues to be fun to see so many sell orders around $100k, but the around $100k walls seem to be getting less and less and less steep. for some strange reason.  Who would-a-thunk?


That is be called koreck.

Whimpy is on one end of the spectrum and aggressive is on the other end of the spectrum.  Of course, they are relative concepts that have trade-offs, and with bitcoin, I frequently suggest to attempt to be as aggressive as you can without overdoing it, but without some level of realistic insight, you would not necessarily know that you had overdone it until you end up getting yourself into a pickle.

In regards to whimpiness, in bitcoin the whimpy ones have done way better than those who failed/refused to act, and the whimpy ones also were likely to do better than the ones who were overly aggressive, since it is better to still be in the game than to be knocked out of the game (or some folks maybe spend a whole cycle or more building their bitcoin position and then they end  up having to start over because they were overly aggressive).