Most people could care less about bounties and bounty managers unless they are either the manager or a participant in the bounty. The bounty being posted creates so much spam half the time, that users would rather bounties just disappear. That being said, there has been the start of a discussion regarding who should be a manager, what responsibilities they have to users, responsibilities to the project and team, when they should be tagged or if they should be tagged.
If I can say something about it correctly, I want to say something from the analysis I have done in the past. Bounty managers were previously very trusted but have now turned upside down. Now it is seen in Bounty that new managers come and promote projects from project managers on the forum, but those who participate in the campaign do not get paid despite working properly. These things seem very bad to me. Bounty hunters are not getting any payment despite working hard because of bounty managers' scams. That is why the trust of ordinary hunters in managers is decreasing. New bounty managers are doing this because they are not being brought under any law because of the hunters' lack of love. New managers need to understand something about responsibility. They are also harmful to project managers, and in the meantime, they are ruining the forum's reporting and harming hunters. We should come out of such problems and take proper measures.
1. What should be the requirements to even be trying to manage anything on this forum?
I want to share with you what I understand with my tiny brain. To manage something in this forum, one must be experienced. One must know about the forum's rules and regulations and what steps should be taken for the campaign. One must understand the good and bad sides of the project's direction after running the campaign. One must know whether he can ensure customer service by running the campaign. One must create a mindset to manage it mentally so that one can handle everything well.
2. Should projects who will not escrow be allowed to advertise? If yes, should a manager be tagged if the team doesn't pay?
It would be better not to allow advertising for projects that do not escrow because it is unfortunate and disappointing if the hunters work hard and do not get paid. If you run a campaign without escrow and the team does not pay later, the general hunters will likely be harmed in this regard. Running a campaign without escrow means that there is a scam, so it would be better not to promote projects that do not escrow. Working on a project without escrow implies that you know you will not get anything from it but are constantly working hard for it. So why would you run for a hunter who has no destination? You should tag the directors who do not pay; if you do not tag them, they will get a chance to scam later.
3. Should bounty hunters be tagged or ignored if they join a bounty not escrowed and they make a complaint here?
Bounty hunters should not be tagged or ignored because they join bounties without escrow in the hope of getting paid. Some experienced bounty managers on the forum join the boundary out of loyalty to them if they run bounties without escrow. Although he runs the boundary out of loyalty, the manager cannot pay the bounty hunters if the hunter joins and the project team leaves without paying. When the bounty manager cannot pay, the hunters make various complaints. Although their complaints are reasonable, the manager could not pay for the project because the managers did not pay the manager. Therefore, the escrow campaign should be stopped so that no one has any reporting problems.
4. Should we just not care and keep shit the same?
We should watch both sides, take care, and check on both sides. If we only take care of it but cannot manage it properly, then it will not work. They complement each other, so we should keep an eye on both sides.
5. Should teams be doxxed to stop the possibility of a scam and open the possibility of legal actions?
You'r right. Legal steps must be taken to stop the scam. If this scam can be prevented, trust will be gained, no one will be cheated, no one will face any loss, and no one's report will be damaged. There needs to be a very fair legal rule that should be followed, or the parties should be convinced through steps. This will ensure that scams and scams will be eliminated. These legal steps are essential for establishing truth and justice.
I may add more questions if someone posts a good 1 to be added. I will remove spam comments, not looking for anyone to fill their sig quota with a generic opinion
Here is one more information you can add:- If hunters try to multi, then should they be tagged?
- If hunters make false complaints about managers, then should they be tagged?
Just want to clarify why I say no more newbie managers. If a team gets rejected by 3-4 managers because they won't escrow, they will eventually get someone to accept the job who didn't ask for anything to be escrowed or run the bounty themselves and will likely be looking to scam. I'm not against a newbie coming here for a job as long as they're doing thigs correctly, but I feel like newbie accounts are more likely to not care about being tagged and will just disappear and make a new account for the next bounty scam.
A newbie can do this because it seems they are currently bringing new bounties, but after a few days, they disappear from the forum again. Disappearing does not mean that they have left the forum. They are creating another new account, returning to the forum, and working to scam. If a newbie comes forward correctly, he can be welcomed, but if they do such scams, they should be tagged, and this kind of system should be stopped so that they cannot scam again in the future.
[W.W]