Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: When should bounty managers be tagged for not being responsible (discussion)
by
Plaguedeath
on 01/12/2024, 05:34:45 UTC
I have said to escrow the funds in order to change the culture in bounties.

But, it's almost impossible because the project can just looking for someone who willing to manage the bounties even just a newbie account. Bounty hunters who participate in un-escrowed campaign not deserved to be tagged since they're not scam. Remember, leaving negative feedback without any financial loss or just something like "likely to scam" is technically inappropriate.

I don't think your question can be answered, because it's a case by case basis.

A campaign managed by trusted campaign managers high unlikely not get negative feedback, while a campaign managed by newbies high likely to get negative feedback, change my mind.

It's the same thing with someone complaint a popular casino and unknown casino, the unknown casino will receive negative feedback instantly.

If we speak by the reality, I would say keep shit the same.

5. Should teams be doxxed to stop the possibility of a scam and open the possibility of legal actions?
Even someone have doxxed the teams, the project might use someone else identity, so it doesn't affect anything to them.