Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: When should bounty managers be tagged for not being responsible (discussion)
by
Perfectbaby
on 02/12/2024, 16:43:49 UTC
Sorry I have to go straight to the questions than keep romancing the whole thing here, though I saw this topic since yesterday but I wasn't in right mind to reply as I don't want to give a hasten reply or feedback.

Also I would have to apologise if my answers looks so strict or so rude to your liking, but I have to voice out.

Please take a minute and answer these questions:
1. What should be the requirements to even be trying to manage anything on this forum?
To me if following by the forum ranking/trust system at least Sr. Member rank rank is enough, at least making sure he/she escrowed the funds for the participants, than just caring about their management fees and whatever may be their interest in managing project.

Quote
2. Should projects who will not escrow be allowed to advertise? If yes, should a manager be tagged if the team doesn't pay?
If a project that doesn't escrowed their funds is allowed then there should be a form of agreement between them and some of the forum staff or reputable members in other to keep participants funds secured, though if you look at it the other way round you would see that all these bring higher traffic to the forum. Therefore, if they must advertised their brands there should be a means to pay hunters or any hunters who chooses to join such company is at their own risk, even though the manager has put a disclaimer stating everything on the thread.

However, to be on a neutral ground I would say manager shouldn't be accepting projects that refuse to escrow their fund at least there should be a priority to hunters even though they're being regarded as nothing but, these people waste their precious time, Data and energy to promote those projects on various media so there should be a level of respect to them as well.


Quote
3. Should bounty hunters be tagged or ignored if they join a bounty not escrowed and they make a complaint here?
Usually after some modifications and they chooses to join then when there's any complaint or any post and scam accusations about any projects towards bounty participation, then such topic can be moved to archive since it's already clearly stated that hunters shouldn't join any bounty that is not escrowed IMO.

Quote
4. Should we just not care and keep shit the same?


Usually judging from how this forum is Free, and open for everyone there should be freedom of everything, but that doesn't mean they would have to toyed with hunters and anyone here, so to me there should be a level of modification to suits and favored the both parties.

Quote
5. Should teams be doxxed to stop the possibility of a scam and open the possibility of legal actions?
I don't think is actually necessary because 1-4 already sort and expressed the whole issues. So it's better for anyone buying the tokens or even joining the bounty should take proper precautions of what they are doing. At least there is a reason for this forum and we can't bridge that for whatever reason that may be purpose, even though we are trying to fight to favor everyone in this forum.

This is my own version of feedback
Thank you.