if the person had a positive interaction with him their positive might be warranted - everyone cannot simply give him negative because someone else had a bad experience.

by your logic not only should the people who have had a bad experience with mrcrypthodl (there are many - not denying that at all) should leave a negative - and that would be right. But to demand that those who have had nothing but good experiences (lucky ducks) with mrcrypthodl are then required to flip their positive to a negative is flawed.

that is like saying you or I even - who have had negative feedback - that because we do, everyone who left us a positive is a piece of shit and must flip their trust. And that is nonsense. And sitting there calling all the honest, hard working people here names and speaking ill of them is not going to get you what you want.

That said, based on current standing with quite a few customers - I do think a flag should be raised (regardless of trust) if not already. He should stop selling until all prior issues are resolved.