I don't want to say stake.com originals is rigged because I don't have any proof, but I feel like there's something wrong with stake.com Originals. Here's why I feel this way: Every time I click or double my bet the next result is a loss (often), even with low odds. This has happened to me many times in Limbo as well. For example, on my first spin playing Limbo, I went all in and the result was x1 (0). This doesn't just happen on Stake.com; it has also happen on other casinos I played. Because of this, I don't play Originals anymore, except if there's tournaments. I'm more focus now in sportbetting.
it's all just mind games on our end. as a 1.1x dice enjoyer, i lose way too many times as well than i would like when i go all in. (please don't try this, it's stupid)
but i'm sure no shady business is going on in the background as most of the original games are provably fair, and you can always verify the results using third party tools like the one from BTCGOSU:
https://www.btcgosu.com/tools/provably-fair-verifier/no harm checking the results from time to time, just to be sure.
Without much experience on this field [so my words can perhaps be treated as empty air], IMO the idea that originals being rigged can be somewhat thwarted. On a past case regarding Stake's Minesweeper game, a rep of CG even went to a length to create an account here [granted, he didn't state it openly that he's the CG staff, but it can be very easily inferred], built his own verifier,explain to the player [whom... rather have similar trait with this OP] how he can test with his "home-made" verifier, and shown that [IIRC] random sampling came out verifiable.