Borrowing a document and using it just to fulfil the KYC requirement and making use of the platform is really an unnecessary thing. Surely this is going to create a problem in the long run.
That is totally right.
That will create ruckus to the one who is gambling with that account. A gambler that have borrowed identity just to get KYCed will surely run into problems.
We will never know when but if the time comes and that person who they borrowed document for verification isn't around and the casino asks for an additional doc, what could they do with that and if there is some hefty funds that are in there?
but now... do you really think so?
I mean, how often they will check KYCed accounts?
all the time or only after big wins?
I think usually they check on us whenever we're about to withdraw such huge amounts.
and even if they check, why can't the person just borrow it again and pay, to solve the problems they may have had...
I'm not sure...
You'll never know if that person is still there when he's needed.
Even though we talk like this, the fact is that there are still a lot of people who try to do that and even things like this can happen around us for various reasons that ultimately only center on personal gain in the end.
I'm not going to say that this is justified because for me it only makes things more complicated for myself but for some people who do this they must also have their own views so they try to register and KYC with someone else's identity in order to benefit themselves.
My friend is like this where he did KYC with someone else's data because he thought that he really didn't want to be registered on a gambling site but still wanted to gamble on it. I can't prohibit it because in the end there is already a decision between one and the other so everything that is done in the end depends on the point of view and there will definitely be pros and cons about this.
There's a difference about a guy wanting to gamble using others identity and someone who wants to do it on his own with his own identity.
The first person would easily go away with whatever he's got because he's got no obligation as it's not his identity. Whilst the latter, there's a sense of responsibility because of using his own identity.