You seem to be getting over excited about your own ideas about what is poor, Justbillywitt.  Of course, there is not just one level of poor, and some of us might be defining poor in different ways, and if we are defining poverty in different ways, then we might be arguing about semantics rather than figuring out thresholds in which it might be advisable or acceptable to invest into bitcoin versus not doing so.

You are correct that a person who cannot pay all of his expenses will not be able invest in bitcoin, since there is a need to have money beyond expenses and to be able to keep the money in bitcoin for 4-10 years or longer - otherwise with a shorter timeline, they would be trading/gambling with their money rather than investing... so not only does any person need to have discretionary income to be able to invest in bitcoin, they also need to be able to commit to keeping that discretionary income in bitcoin for 4-10 years or longer.

We likely realize that even poor people gamble with their money, so we cannot stop people from choosing to gamble with their money..

I am not going to try to proclaim to know all of the various levels of poverty, yet we know that there can be quite a bit of variance both in the terms of destitute that any person might have and the level of destitute will  vary over time.. .so a person that is destitute may well have periods in which he has extra money that he could invest into bitcoin, yet it may well be unwise to invest, since he might not have any kind of confidence in regards to being able to continue to get income at various points into the future.