Ahoy, Captain Contradiction! 

Let’s address your misfired critique point by point because, clearly, nuance isn’t your strong suit: 

1. "Blaming a support agent?" 
Not quite. If you actually read my posts (assuming you’re capable), you’d see that I’m calling out the systemic lack of accountability at Stake, not the individual agent. But hey, strawman arguments seem to be your thing, so carry on. 

2. "Why do you even want a monthly?" 
Why does a bad company offer a monthly to begin with? Oh, right—because it’s part of their predatory retention tactics. A stolen monthly isn’t about entitlement; it’s about exposing dishonesty. The fact that this escapes you says more about your priorities than mine. 

3. "Move to a new site." 
Ah, the classic “just move on” defense. Why advocate for change or accountability when you can sweep things under the rug, right? I’m sure the companies love apologists like you. Makes their job easier. 

4. "Worried for my safety." 
That’s rich coming from someone who ignores the documented threats Stake’s founders and affiliates have been implicated in. But sure, mock away—it’s easier than grappling with facts. 

5. "The desperation is real." 
If holding a fraudulent business accountable is desperate, then what does defending their tactics make you? Enlightened? Spoiler alert: it doesn’t. You’re just another voice trying to gaslight victims into silence. 

6. "Blackmail?" 
Funny accusation, considering I’ve been nothing but transparent in my demands for fair treatment and lawful compliance. Your attempt to spin this into “blackmail” is as laughable as it is baseless. 

So here’s the thing: your comments don’t diminish my case—they highlight how blind loyalty and ignorance enable unethical practices. Instead of trolling, try contributing something of value to the conversation. Until then, enjoy those three birthday bonuses—they seem to be your crowning achievement. 

Stay salty, Captain Contradiction. 🎉🎂