Actually, it's only you showing that you are not smart enough to understand the evidence. No wonder universities are failing. They just aren't failing as badly as you.
Regards,
-Joseph Van Name Ph.D.
You fail to provide any proof for evolution because there isn't any. Oh, there is a bunch of talk. But all evolution talk could be explained as something else if somebody wanted to take the time to explain it a different way.
To prove evolution, you need something that literally goes back in time to a certain point, then choose a thing that evolved (a good guess), and the follow it up to the present to prove that it was some form of change that made a significant difference.
Nobody can do that. All of evolution theory is and always will be only theory. At least until somebody builds a time viewer or time machine. And that's just the start. You would need super robots or generations of people to follow up a whole bunch of leads from the past to see if any of them changed.
Presently there is nothing at all along those lines that can do such followup. Evolution is simply a nice story, and a whole bunch of guesswork. And you, just like the universities, fell for it... because you are university trained, and not really a thinker.