And, so many folks tend to get caught up upon the metric of average cost per BTC (even on an overall portfolio level), yet Saylor/MSTR seem to not be phased by such metric, including that they started out buying BTC at around $10k per BTC, and their average cost per BTC has gone up considerably, including now right close to $62k per BTC for their whole stash.

You also might be correct fillippone in your insinuation that the reality might be more important that the number of sats per share might be a more important metric, since they issue the debt to be able to buy the bitcoin and then when the debt converts to equities, then the debt is relieved and the share holders (including Saylor himself with a majority holdings) are more wealthy in terms of how many bitcoin they hold.

It's a bit difficult to imagine if Saylor/MSTR will be able to continue to buy more than $1 billion worth of bitcoin per week through 2025 for example, and with the way that they are going it might inch to higher numbers rather than lower numbers, perhaps getting to purchases of $10 billion or more per week?


A funny thing about Schiff is that he is trying to imply that bitcoin's price is ONLY going up because Saylor is pumping the price, which is what trolls tend to do with their attempts at simplifying matters into seemingly single explanations that do not really add up since they will have a multitude of simple and even internally contradictory explanations... while at the same time having fun staying poor for themselves and for anyone following their ongoing and wrong precautionary warnings.