[edited out]
Well, when I gave my example I had in mind not only people from the USA but from the rest of the world, and I also believe that in the future the revaluation of bitcoin is going to be potentially lower than the calculation made since 9 or 12 years ago. Although next year looks very bullish I believe that the returns of the next 3 cycles will be lower than the returns of the last 3 cycles.
I recall that when Saylor first got into bitcoin, he was frequently proclaiming bitcoin is going to double every year, since that was what the history showed, yet in recent times, he got more realistic, in terms of expecting a CAGR that slowly goes down in the amount, so that even if we might be in the 70% territory for our current CAGR, he is expecting a CAGR of something like 29% by 2045, which seems reasonable as a kind of working parameter.
On a personal level, I would not want to get caught too much off guard in regards to the level of my optimism in regards to the anticipated CAGR, which is part of the reason that I like to consider the 200-WMA rather than the spot price, and we can see that so far, the 200-WMA has never failed to go up less than 20% in any year, yet since it is a lagging indicator, we still might be able to consider if the BTC spot price is staying above the 200-WMA more than 20%, then the 200-WMA is still likely to continue to go up at least 20% per year... and yeah, we don't sell at the 200-WMA, and we sell at spot price, so if possible, if we need the money, it is way better to be selling any BTC when the spot prices are way above the 200-WMA rather than close to the 200-WMA.
Right now spot prices are nearly 150% higher than the 200-WMA.