That's sounds incorrect IMO as far as this thread is concerned, but might be possible if the investor has that crazy purchasing power and can be consistent. I think we have to look at something here, and that's how powerful our accumulation can be in that long term. If we're to stick with what has been said, then it means even someone with a $40-50 investment can also hit half a million in profits when Bitcoin eventually turns $1M, which isn't true in every sense.
But, on a contrary, there might be some possibility to what has been said, but as far as this thread is concerned, it's very impossible. The people trying to learn something under this thread aren't has tough as Microstrategy in terms of personal purchasing power. we have new investors joining this thread, so bringing up such statement is misleading.
You're not wrong though but not everyone visiting the thread is a forum..and at the same time some people can still achieve that but they need more than investing just $40-50 even though investment intervals also contributes, it's not possible to archive even though it's done daily but there's an assurance of good ROI but that's with respect to investor's portfolio.
Investor do not necessarily need a high purchasing power as that of Microstrategy to archieve $500k profit when Bitcoin hit a million dollar, even though they still need a high purchasing power but it's minimal compared to Microstrategys', it takes just 1btc (bitcoin @100k) to archieve upto 900k profit when BTC hit $1M which means technically If an investor can accumulate upto $150k+ worth of btc when BTC is still within the range of $100k ~ $300k then they can archive $500k and above profit when Bitcoin hits $1M just that 150 grand isn't a small money and for an investor to archive and with DCA,he must be willing to buy around 1.2grand worth of BTC every week till the next halving( hopefully bitcoint doesn't breach 300k+ before the next halving cycle) .
Generally, no one know when Bitcoin is going to hit 1M or even 500k but that's not the major concern which is why I agreed o the point of "bringing this up is not necessary" which is not technically possible in the first place, but all I know is every investment will surely get a good ROI with time compare to just holding Fiat which loses value overtime..