They said”there’s no pattern in this puzzle”, what makes you think that there’s a formula based in math that can get the key, even if it was created by math/method?
Yes, there is no pattern.
I did not say that it was created with mathematics.
I said that there is a math between the prefixes of Small Bits (1-90 bits range), that these are not as thought.
The only thing you are right about is that all calculations are not fixed processes. One prefix comes out at a certain point, while the other comes out at a completely different place.
I am someone who tries many calculations on the assumption values like this, and does manual scanning.
I do not have to prove anything to anyone, but I am very happy that the resulting prefix is in the range I calculated.
When I increase my hardware power a little more, you will understand me.
For now, pop the corn. Pull the company's CAT6 cable, do your duty as a dog from morning to night. Because you are a very big person.
I guess you are old. Because such arrogance and arrogance, thinking yourself high, such things do not suit you. (KTimesG)
I understand what you're saying, and I’ve also noticed interesting patterns in the prefixes. Even certain letters in the address can indicate whether they are higher or lower in the Base58 charset depending on their position.
Your observation about the calculations and how the prefixes don’t follow a fixed process but still fall within a calculated range is fascinating. This kind of manual exploration, while challenging, can be very rewarding. The connection between hardware power and efficiency in this kind of testing is undeniable, and it’s clear you’re putting effort and passion into the subject.
Regarding the tone at the end of your comment, I think differing perspectives can be constructive when approached respectfully. Keep pushing forward with your calculations and discoveries—I hope you achieve some exciting breakthroughs when you enhance your hardware!