I vaguely remember the Naim guy and the quote of mine stating the mods fucked up, but that doesn't change the fact that just because I comment in a thread I am not allowed to ask questions as to your end game, nor does it make my comment wrong.
Agreed. The only way clarity can be ascertained is by asking about it.
I have no issue with this thread and you trying to investigate if someone is connected to someone who should be banned. Let's not forget that the guy was banned for plagiarism which doesn't exactly make him a big bitcointalk scammer, just a lazy douche.
I also cannot recall him scamming either but enrolling as many farmed accounts as he could on campaigns in one thing but eventually by default infiltrating (or possibly one day being in a position to infiltrate) DT is a different matter altogether. In the scamming department he might have kept away from controversy but if someone is conducting in form form of nefarious conduct then there is no reason to believe they will not change paths if an opportunity arose.
Not sure why Poker Player has decided only his way matters, but it is what it is. Like i said, I deal with thousands of users a year and don't recall everything right off the top of my head in most cases.
You assume I should remember every douche on this forum is where I have an issue. Regardless of whether I search a guys name and get acquainted with his past, my questions are still valid. Now that Jollygood has reminded me of him, it's a case of plagiarism, nothing more IMO. Still should be banned but not on the top 100 bitcoin scammers ever. So essentially a waste of everyones time to even care about the guy.
I would agree in the general sense but when it comes to Naim027 I would try advocate caution because if he infiltrates DT then it is not good for anybody using the forum.