Hhhhh...

Let's make things clear, because apparently [and surprisingly] I am tired of being mentioned again and again, used as a punching bag you use to vent up your frustration, painted as... well, those not-so-nice-words about me, and apparently became one of the focal point of this series of threads of yours due to my silence... in your yet-another vent up, where it seems [from what can be inferred from those post where my name being mentioned] it was my fault that this situation did not get resolved, because I remove myself from your case.

My silence and me removing myself from your case does not translate as me closing my eyes. Like other case where I even put the user on ignore, I still periodically read his posts in order to be sure I am updated, so I can reflect it to my list accordingly. That list is my duty to this forum, and I take it with all that entails.

Specifically speaking about your case, I completely remove myself after that... joyful word you "praised" me, is not just because it offend me. I have to have a thicker skin, selectively deaf ear, and sudden-random blindness to certain offensive and anger-venting posts if I want to keep contributing to this board, since people throw so many nasty words to me when the resolution did not go into their favor. So yeah, as much as it annoyed me, I got over it... mostly.

The more major reason I kept my silence is because I noticed that you have two tendencies:

1. You'll praise [over-praise, if I may speak freely] people who take your side, and when they shifted their "alliance" or give a doubt of you, you'll [I can only describe it as] throw tantrum at them. I believe it's safe to say I am a very good living proof and case on point. I can give you another perfect example if you want, just from the top of my head.

Not trying to patronize you here, nor it related to your case, a mere two cents from me; stop. You're a grown man. That attitude [merriam-webster have a good word to perfectly describe this thing, but I'll refrain from using it] will bring you nowhere, at least here, in the world called reality.

2. Hovering. Or whatever terms that fits the description better where one think the world revolves around him, so things should be done and people should bid their time for that person.

I won't pretend I know how old you are, I somehow have a feeling that you're several years above me, regardless of the behavior you show us. What I know is that you need a reality check: we, a species called homo sapiens, or human, in common terms, and all of the animals and the plants, live in a round rock with gravitational force that keep its populants from flying freely in space. That rock, called Earth, revolves around one of the star in Milky Way system called Sun. In Eridanus term, we revolve around Theta Eridani, the star. Not the other way round, and definitely Eridanus did not revolve around one specific being.

That two factors lead me to think that the best approach for your case is to wait and see.

As I mentioned on the earlier paragraph, though, it does not translate as me closing my eyes. I simply wait [and ignore all of the jabs you throw at me] for Rollbit compliance team's conclusion. After that...



What I wrote [it's a very long message] should not concern you, nor be known. What I'll let you know, though, is that far as I remember, I've never go to that length with Rollbit [there is a big chance I remember wrongly, though] for someone. Especially one that... well, did what you done.

I'll also let you know three other things:

One, that is my last attempt for you. Regardless of what Razer said, or if he didn't respond at all, that's it and that's all. I will do no more thing, I will go back to my silence, and I will simply observe. No other action at all. I've done what I can. Don't ask for more.

Two, I will not support or oppose the flag. It does not translates as I supporting Rollbit or thinking you're wrong here. If that concept seems alien to you, we don't live in the world of black and white, a yes and a no. There are grays and maybes. We don't support, we don't oppose. We simply abstained. Me personally, because --as I repetitively say-- I can understand both sides. I've walk in your shoes and see through their glasses.

Whatever outburst you'll have after reading that paragraphs above, about it means I am supporting Rollbit , feel free to do it. Watch for your blood pressure, though.

Supporting your flag would betray my belief that Rollbit are not 100% guilty here, and opposing your flag would betray my belief that you were in tight position [ignoring the preventive measures you can actually do]. In other words, taking any action to the flag you raised will be an abuse of my DT power.

Feel free to twist my abstaining into "supporting" rollbit because I somehoe can understand them with "no proof", or other words you can freely recycle from your past posts, that "those who stay silence" or "close their eyes" or whatever that is you wrote in the past to justify your view that anyone that is not in your side and/or stays silence is the bad actors. I can't and will not keep you from saying whatever you want [well, with one exception as written on the point number 3 below].

Three, I would really advise you that this is the last time you write my name in your case with a wording that put a shade that I am in Rollbit's side and their supporter. Perhaps it'll be better if you stopped mentioning my name at all. Lest you meet the other side of me [the username I choose actually has a "philosophical" nature in it, go figure] that will explain in details to the forum why this case should not be a case at all because factually and contractually you are not and should not be eligible for anything.

Might be wise to remind you that I roam this board every day, and I have a very strong memory, and when it failed to help me, I also have a notebook with full handwritten key-facts about cases I oversee.