I want to address a few points. Firstly, I never requested the account deletion, I have asked you multiple times to provide proof of such a request if it exists, yet no evidence has been provided. As I’ve consistently stated my intent is to verify the specific losing streak, not to dispute any winning bets. Thirdly, the results you posted earlier regarding my bets did not specify which bets were wins or losses, which is crucial, as I’ve mentioned Duckdice.io appeared to play against me during the last 300 or approximately 350 bets, ultimately depleting my balance to zero.
Additionally, I was not even aware that account deletion was an option at Duckdice. I belive my account was only deleted after I created a public post against Duckdice.io, raising concerns about fairness and transparency.
1. I won't get into the account deletion again as its pointless right now, I've tried my best explaining it countless of times.
2. You clearly started this whole thread claiming that you had an unreal 158 loosing streak which caused you to lose 0.38 BTC, I know you weren't expecting the bet evidence to be something we could verify, I wasn't also, the sole fact you posted that screenshot with the bet id made it possible to verify that certain server seed.
3. I have just told you we will check the next 50000 rolls for that "158 red streak" so why are you now switching it to " as I’ve mentioned Duckdice.io appeared to play against me during the last 300 or approximately 350 bets, ultimately depleting my balance to zero."? Your whole story currently changed, you clearly claimed in the OP that a betting streak of 158 on 15.5% losses caused you to lose, and now you're claiming its losing bets vs winning bets, which changes the whole narrative, I know that you believe this is something that you can leverage again, but we can actually check that aswell, check the losing bets vs winning bets for the first 50k rolls on that seed, and I'll guarantee its more or less around 14-14.5% winning hands, accounting for the 1% house edge.
4. I'm sorry if my tone seems unprofessional to the rest of bitcointalk, but we've been dealing with this exact type of user for years now, while I can't prove its the exact person as in previous cases ( in previous cases the accuser wouldn't delete his duckdice accounts/alt accounts, and in the end we could always track/connect them), every once in a while, a fake accusation pops up, coupled with some trustpilot spam, and other things, and when the case gets proven to be fake ( which will be the same situation as now, once I verify his future 50k rolls), another one will pop-up in a month or 2, or 5.
Third, umm, weren't the inent is to verify a specific losing bets? The result they posted earlier were displaying the longest losing streak they can dig. I don't think I understand. How do which bets is winning or losing become relevant in this pursue of verifying a long losing streak?
He's simply trying to change the narrative which makes no sense, claiming that he lost that 0.38 btc because the losing bets were a lot more than winning bets.
Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.