Re: [Syria under terrorist attack] update: ISIS/Da'esh rule is re-established
The US regime's plan has worked to some small extent by distracting the world from the Holocaust that Israel is carrying out in Gaza. Although it is not a complete victory because the world has not forgotten it and the genocide is still going on.
[,,,]
There will eventually be a government in Syria though, a government that will consist of all people and minorities. But first the US backed terrorists aka al-Qaida have to be neutralized.
Historically that has been the final result of other desperate attempts by the the US regime as well. Like the removal of the Ba'thi party from Iraq and the first establishment of ISIL about 20 years ago; something that resulted in participation of all Iraqis in the government and Iraq becoming one of the biggest allies of Iran.
They removed the Ba'thi party from Syria in 2024 and re-established a much weaker version of ISIL, the result in a couple of years from now won't be any different
But for the time being the US regime with all their plans having fallen apart because they never expected Assad to just leave, is going to waste trillions of dollars of American taxpayers' money in Syria (money they don't even have any more, not like in early 2000's in Bush admin.) desperately trying to change the situation and still end up losing the same exact way they wasted $12 trillion of it in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan in the past 20 years and still lost
#warofattrition
[,,,]
Ok, so from there's no government we have now made some progress and you admit that there is a government. However, as usual you play over and over the Iranian official rethoric: Anything bad is because the external enemies that hate us are doing this and that.
Now, since there is a government, I would like to see in the first what that government is going to do. As far as I know there are a million small radical muslim groups that are will to commit terror attacks all over, but there is also a chance of this goverment trying to stablish pacific relations with others.
If you want to call terrorists reign somewhere a "government" then that is your indoctrinated brain speaking but nobody in the world would call these terrorists (which for simplicity I will continue referring to as al-Qaeda) a "government".Now, since there is a government, I would like to see in the first what that government is going to do. As far as I know there are a million small radical muslim groups that are will to commit terror attacks all over, but there is also a chance of this goverment trying to stablish pacific relations with others.
There will eventually be a government in Syria though, a government that will consist of all people and minorities. But first the US backed terrorists aka al-Qaida have to be neutralized.
Historically that has been the final result of other desperate attempts by the the US regime as well. Like the removal of the Ba'thi party from Iraq and the first establishment of ISIL about 20 years ago; something that resulted in participation of all Iraqis in the government and Iraq becoming one of the biggest allies of Iran.
They removed the Ba'thi party from Syria in 2024 and re-established a much weaker version of ISIL, the result in a couple of years from now won't be any different
But for the time being the US regime with all their plans having fallen apart because they never expected Assad to just leave, is going to waste trillions of dollars of American taxpayers' money in Syria (money they don't even have any more, not like in early 2000's in Bush admin.) desperately trying to change the situation and still end up losing the same exact way they wasted $12 trillion of it in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan in the past 20 years and still lost
#warofattrition
A government is a government. They have control over an area and have made an effort to keep the administrative aparatus of the previous regime, because it is precisely what is required. You do not like them, but you are absolutely fine with the massive political killing and torturing of Al-Asad. Your choice, but... well, it is gone. To bad for you.
Now there are two ways to go about this. Again, your choice is to attack immediately - again, the wrong choice. You are going to be making here a carreer of chosing wrong and repeating over and over the Iranian doctrine.