quote author=holydarkness link=topic=5481683.msg64876880#msg64876880 date=1734947945]
I know it's your thread. But my issue with stake is not resolved. You should make changes asap.
Uhh... what?
Like I said, though I put you on ignore, I have to see your post every now and then [in case you're curious, the only reason I realized you wrote to me on this thread is because I read it from tetaeridanus' post] to mark the status of the cases accordingly. Was below post not yours? You did not write it?
After much thought, I believe it's time to focus on peace and understanding. [...] Peace and awareness are the first steps to creating a healthier mindset, both in gambling and life. Stay aware, stay strong, and remember to always take care of yourselves.
You moving forward does not mean you consider the case resolved? That is not moving forward, that is staying where you are. You should say "I am standing firm with both of my feet", not that touching elegy. Learn to own your words.
[/quote]
Holydarkness, your entire argument is like watching a dog chase its own tail—pointless and embarrassing. My post about peace and awareness had *nothing* to do with resolution; it was a reflection on the bigger picture of gambling’s impact. But sure, keep twisting it into some nonsensical attack. Maybe next time, try “owning” a better understanding of context before you lecture others. Or perhaps clarity isn’t your strong suit—just like neutrality isn’t.
What interests and benefits are these that you're referring here, if I may ask?
If a case inconvenience me or "my affiliates", the most convenient way is to mark it as "resolved", as it means the case is closed. Being "in progress" is the total opposite of what you accuse me of doing, since it means the case is still ongoing, open, being scrutinized, awaiting development, inquired, and all terms that encompass the sense of being... well, in progress. How is this convenient to me and "my affiliates"? Having an accusation being active that can damage their reputation? SMH. Logic has left the brain.
Convenient? Oh, absolutely—your so-called “in progress” status is the perfect tool to stall, mislead, and exhaust people into giving up on their cases. It’s not about scrutiny; it’s about playing defense for casinos while pretending to be neutral. The idea that unresolved accusations inconvenience your affiliates is laughable—it’s just another tactic to keep things ambiguous and protect their image while silencing critics. Your logic hasn’t just “left the brain”—it never existed in the first place.
And, to date, you [amongst others who share similar mindset as you] have failed to disprove this allegation. I invited you to prove that I "sustain" myself from the service that is not "for free", so far I didn't see you prove it. And that's me failing to disprove the allegation? What prove to disprove? You haven't provide any...
Oh well, or perhaps you've provide it somewhere, but I didn't notice, since I put you on ignore.
If so, kindly send me the link that post that detailing my allegiances with casinos, with proof, I'll try to disprove them once received.
Holydarkness, your entire existence on this forum screams “casino apologist.” Do you really think playing dumb with “proof” requests fools anyone? Your bias is blatant—you go out of your way to defend casinos, downplay accusations, and discredit victims. Ignoring people doesn’t erase the truth; it just makes your intentions even clearer. If you truly wanted to disprove your allegiances, you’d have acted like a neutral party from the start. Instead, your behavior is proof enough.
Job. A work. Business.
But why don't I turn the table? Since you're all about "legitimate" and critical and statistical and all, I'll offer you the same question that I gave to others who [endlessly] questions my relation with casinos: prove it. The Blockchain is there, at your service. If I am at their payroll, you'll easily find them.
One thing that I can't help but wonder is what really crossed these people's head, those who think I am in bed with casinos. Just because I have their contacts and they answer to my summon, that does not mean we're friend.
Well, we are "friend" but we are not friend. I mean, for the love of all holy and dark being, what would you feel [I'll ask this to anyone, not just you] if I reach you on daily basis to tell you that you have an issue, and when you did not answer, I kept nudging your TG or through PM until you get it done? What would you feel if whenever you open your phone and got a notification that I messaged you, it means I brought you a problem and criticize you?
Ah, so you’re the casinos’ unpaid messenger boy now? Pestering them on Telegram day and night until they “fix” things? That’s rich. You’re trying to pass off your obsessive loyalty to casinos as “just doing your job,” but the mask is off. If you’re so “neutral,” why is every single move you make perfectly aligned with their interests? The more you try to defend yourself, the more you expose your role as their shield.
Holydarkness, your entire act is a circus, and you’re the clown juggling excuses. No one’s buying your neutrality, and every word you write only digs your hole deeper. Maybe it’s time you stop pretending to be an arbiter of justice and admit what everyone already knows—you’re just another casino puppet trying to silence dissent.